wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - 1, 2, 6, 42, ... »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 25th, 2024, 6:32am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   medium
(Moderators: Icarus, SMQ, Grimbal, william wu, ThudnBlunder, Eigenray, towr)
   1, 2, 6, 42, ...
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: 1, 2, 6, 42, ...  (Read 2021 times)
cool_joh
Guest

Email

1, 2, 6, 42, ...  
« on: Nov 22nd, 2007, 8:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

an = an-1 (an-1 + 1)
 
How can we find the common formula for an?
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: 1, 2, 6, 42, ...  
« Reply #1 on: Nov 23rd, 2007, 12:15am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

If you mean a closed formula, that may be tricky. I can't find a general method for solving these things (see also http://mathworld.wolfram.com/QuadraticMap.html )
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: 1, 2, 6, 42, ...  
« Reply #2 on: Nov 23rd, 2007, 1:11am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 23rd, 2007, 12:15am, towr wrote:
I can't find a general method for solving these things

It's available here.
 
I find the following very beautiful (taken from Sloane A000058):
 
"The greedy Egyptian representation of 1 is 1 = 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/7 + 1/43 + 1/1807 + ... "
 
which is the sum of reciprocals of an + 1.
 
 
 
 
IP Logged
cool_joh
Guest

Email

Re: 1, 2, 6, 42, ...  
« Reply #3 on: Nov 23rd, 2007, 4:28am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

on Nov 23rd, 2007, 1:11am, Barukh wrote:

It's available here.
 

 
It's too complicated. I'm not good in English, can someone help me please?
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: 1, 2, 6, 42, ...  
« Reply #4 on: Nov 23rd, 2007, 9:08am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Bottom line is this: there exist a constant r, such that an equals to the nearest integer of r2^n (sequence starts at n=0). For this particular sequence, r equals 1.5979...
 
That's kind of cheating since to compute r one needs to know all an-s upfront (formula (19) in the article). The series converges very rapidly, though.
 
Looks like it's the best that could be done (or is known).
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board