wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - prove int »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 28th, 2024, 9:48pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   medium
(Moderators: towr, Icarus, ThudnBlunder, Grimbal, SMQ, Eigenray, william wu)
   prove int
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: prove int  (Read 1171 times)
tony123
Junior Member
**





   


Posts: 61
prove int  
« on: Sep 22nd, 2007, 1:15pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

cos (-89)+cos (-87) +.......+cos87 +cos 89 =csc 1  
 
 
tanČ(pi/7) +tanČ(2pi/7) +tanČ(3pi/7) =4
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: prove int  
« Reply #1 on: Sep 22nd, 2007, 1:59pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Anyone know what "prove int" means? -- I don't.
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: prove int  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 22nd, 2007, 2:03pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 22nd, 2007, 1:59pm, Michael_Dagg wrote:
Anyone know what "prove int" means? -- I don't.

 
tony123 has a bad habit of not providing good titles. Essentially his problems are prove LHS = RHS and in this case two problems...
« Last Edit: Sep 22nd, 2007, 7:08pm by Sameer » IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: prove int  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 22nd, 2007, 6:51pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 22nd, 2007, 1:59pm, Michael_Dagg wrote:
Anyone know what "prove int" means? -- I don't.

I would guess he means Prove It.  
IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: prove int  
« Reply #4 on: Sep 22nd, 2007, 10:01pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Or maybe he meant prove intelligently.
IP Logged
tony123
Junior Member
**





   


Posts: 61
Re: prove int  
« Reply #5 on: Sep 23rd, 2007, 1:43am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

sory all  Kiss
i mean prove  LHS = RHS  in  two problems  Embarassed
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: prove int  
« Reply #6 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 9:38am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The first is easy. The second looks much more difficult (and interesting).
 
BTW, shouldn't it be 21?
« Last Edit: Sep 24th, 2007, 9:47am by Barukh » IP Logged
Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1321
Re: prove int  
« Reply #7 on: Sep 24th, 2007, 1:14pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

For the second one:
 

If a = pi/7
 
then
tan a, tan 2a, ..., tan 6a are roots of the polynomial
 
P(x) = x6 - 21x4 + 35x2 - 7
 
Sum of squares of roots of P(x) is 2*21.
 
Hence the required value is half of that = 21.
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: prove int  
« Reply #8 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 9:56am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 24th, 2007, 1:14pm, Aryabhatta wrote:
For the second one:
 

If a = pi/7
 
then
tan a, tan 2a, ..., tan 6a are roots of the polynomial
 
P(x) = x6 - 21x4 + 35x2 - 7

Why? That's not obvious!
« Last Edit: Sep 25th, 2007, 10:29am by Barukh » IP Logged
pex
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 880
Re: prove int  
« Reply #9 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 10:34am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 25th, 2007, 9:56am, Barukh wrote:
Why? That's not obvious!
Yes, I do think it is. Repeatedly using the addition formula for tangents, we have
 
tan(7t) = tan t * [tan6t - 21tan4t + 35tan2t - 7] / [7tan6t - 35tan4t + 21tan2t - 1].
 
Now obviously, for t = pi/7, 2pi/7, ..., 7pi/7, we have tan(7t) = 0 and thus, these are the roots of
 
tan t * [tan6t - 21tan4t + 35tan2t - 7] = 0.
 
Put differently, tan(pi/7), tan(2pi/7), ..., tan(7pi/7) are the roots of
 
x * [x6 - 21x4 + 35x2 - 7] = 0.
 
Since tan(7pi/7) = 0, we may divide by x to leave an equation of which tan(pi/7), tan(2pi/7), ..., tan(6pi/7) are the roots:
 
x6 - 21x4 + 35x2 - 7 = 0.
IP Logged
Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1321
Re: prove int  
« Reply #10 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 11:32am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 25th, 2007, 9:56am, Barukh wrote:

Why? That's not obvious!

 
It is not, but I didn't want to spoil it for others. pex has explained a way to get it. I did something slightly different, (but essentially same): tan 3a + tan 4a = 0
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: prove int  
« Reply #11 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 2:43pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

And here is how I did it: sin(7t)/[sin(t)cos6(t)] = 0.
 
Actually, at first I did sin(7t)/sin(t)=0, got a polynomial in x=cos2t, and solved for 1/cos2(k/7) = 24.
 
Actually, before that I expressed it in terms of = e/7, and "saw" that it was divisible by 14()=0.  But that is not a good solution.
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: prove int  
« Reply #12 on: Sep 25th, 2007, 11:37pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Nice!
 
The result may be generalized for any odd number 2n+1.
 
What about the first one?
IP Logged
tony123
Junior Member
**





   


Posts: 61
Re: prove int  
« Reply #13 on: Sep 26th, 2007, 3:43am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 22nd, 2007, 1:15pm, tony123 wrote:
cos (-89)+cos (-87) +.......+cos87 +cos 89 =csc 1  
 
 
tanČ(pi/7) +tanČ(2pi/7) +tanČ(3pi/7) =21

IP Logged
Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1321
Re: prove int  
« Reply #14 on: Sep 26th, 2007, 11:45am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 25th, 2007, 11:37pm, Barukh wrote:

What about the first one?

 
Isn't the "arithmetic series" summation of cosines well known?
 
cos 0 + cos h + cos 2h + ... + cos nh = (sin((n+1)h/2) * sin (nh/2))/sin(h/2)
 
(can be done easily using complex numbers I think)
IP Logged
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: prove int  
« Reply #15 on: Sep 26th, 2007, 12:59pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 26th, 2007, 11:45am, Aryabhatta wrote:

 
Isn't the "arithmetic series" summation of cosines well known?
 
cos 0 + cos h + cos 2h + ... + cos nh = (sin((n+1)h/2) * sin (nh/2))/sin(h/2)
 
(can be done easily using complex numbers I think)

 
Correct. You can use the Cis summation method nicely demonstrated by iyerkri
 
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_put nam;action=display;num=1189578447
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board