wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 25th, 2024, 11:43am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   medium
(Moderators: Icarus, william wu, towr, Grimbal, SMQ, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder)
   A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle  (Read 497 times)
K Sengupta
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 371
A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle  
« on: Jun 21st, 2007, 8:32am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Determine the  maximum value of y0 such that   there exists a sequence y0, y1, ... , y1995 of positive reals with y0 = y1995   satisfying:  
        yi-1 + 2/yi-1 = 2yi + 1/yi; for i = 1, ... , 1995
« Last Edit: Jun 21st, 2007, 9:05am by K Sengupta » IP Logged
Aryabhatta
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1321
Re: A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle  
« Reply #1 on: Jun 21st, 2007, 1:07pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Solving the quadratic in yi we see that  
 
either
yi = yi-1/2
 
or  
 
yi = 1/yi-1
 
If 1995 were even, we could always get back y0 no matter what  Tongue
 
Since 1995 is odd, it seems the best we can do is  
21994/y0 = y0
 
i.e the max value of y0 is 2997
 
(this is just an observation, though i think the proof should not be too difficult)
« Last Edit: Jun 21st, 2007, 1:08pm by Aryabhatta » IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle  
« Reply #2 on: Jun 21st, 2007, 11:44pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Right, suppose we start at y, and apply a0 iterations of f(x)=x/2, then g(x)=1/x, then a1 more f, then g, etc., applying g a total of k times, and ending with ak applications of f (allowing ai=0).
 
If k is even, we end up with F(y) = y*2-a0 + a1 - a2 + . . . - ak.  But k + ai = 1995, and since k is even, ai is odd, and so therefore (-1)i ai 0.  Since y > 0, this means F(y) can't be y.
 
So we must have k odd, and F(y) = 2a0 - a1 + a2 - ... - ak/y.  To maximize y with F(y)=y, we must maximize (-1)iai.  But since k + ai = 1995, and k is odd, it's clear that this is maximized with k=1 and a0=1994, giving F(y) = 21994/y.
IP Logged
K Sengupta
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 371
Re: A Reciprocal And maximum Value Puzzle  
« Reply #3 on: Jun 22nd, 2007, 2:10am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jun 21st, 2007, 11:44pm, Eigenray wrote:
Right, suppose we start at y, and apply a0 iterations of f(x)=x/2, then g(x)=1/x, then a1 more f, then g, etc., applying g a total of k times, and ending with ak applications of f (allowing ai=0).
 
If k is even, we end up with F(y) = y*2-a0 + a1 - a2 + . . . - ak.  But k + ai = 1995, and since k is even, ai is odd, and so therefore (-1)i ai 0.  Since y > 0, this means F(y) can't be y.
 
So we must have k odd, and F(y) = 2a0 - a1 + a2 - ... - ak/y.  To maximize y with F(y)=y, we must maximize (-1)iai.  But since k + ai = 1995, and k is odd, it's clear that this is maximized with k=1 and a0=1994, giving F(y) = 21994/y.

 
 
My approach to the problem is basically the same as Eigenray's and  the solution is furnished hereunder as follows:
 
The relation given is a quadratic in xi, so it has two solutions, and by inspection these are yi = 1/yi-1 and yi-1/2.  
 
For an even number of moves we can start with an arbitrary y0 and get back to it. Using  n-1 halvings, and taking the inverse, yields:
 
2n-1/y_0 after n moves.  
Repeating the proceedure retuns one to  to y_0 after 2n moves.  
 
However, it is observed that 1995 is odd.
 
The sequence given above brings one  back to y_0 after n moves, provided that y_0 = 2(n-1)/2.  
 
We show that this is the largest possible y_0.  
 
Suppose we have a halvings followed by an inverse followed by b halvings followed by an inverse.  
 
Then if the number of inverses is odd we end up with 2a-b+c- .../y_0, and if it is even we end up with y0/2a-b+c-...
 
 In the first case, since the final number is y_0 we must have y_0 = 2(a-b+-...)/2.  
 
All the a, b, ... are non-negative and sum to the number of moves less the number of inverses, so we clearly maximise y_0 by taking a single inverse and a = n-1.
 
 In the second case, we must have 2a-b+c- ... = 1 and hence a - b + c - ... = 0.  
 
But that implies that a + b + c + ... is even and hence the total number of moves is even, which it is not.  
 
So we must have an odd number of inverses and the maximum value of y_0 is :
2(n-1)/2.
 
Finally, substituting n= 1995 , it is trivial to observe that the maximum value of y_0 is 2997
« Last Edit: Jun 22nd, 2007, 2:29am by K Sengupta » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board