wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 25th, 2024, 10:56pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   medium
(Moderators: Eigenray, ThudnBlunder, towr, SMQ, Grimbal, Icarus, william wu)
   Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  (Read 4588 times)
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« on: Aug 29th, 2006, 7:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Suppose n=a2+b2 is square-free (a,b integers).  Evaluate
 
Sum( floor[ sqrt(kn) ],  k=1..n ).
IP Logged
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #1 on: Aug 29th, 2006, 9:35pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

What does square-free mean?
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #2 on: Aug 30th, 2006, 12:41am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 29th, 2006, 9:35pm, Sameer wrote:
What does square-free mean?

Square-free numbers have no divisors that are perfect squares. In other words, they are products of different primes.
IP Logged
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #3 on: Aug 30th, 2006, 10:40am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 30th, 2006, 12:41am, Barukh wrote:

Square-free numbers have no divisors that are perfect squares. In other words, they are products of different primes.

 
Ah in short a^2 + b^2 <> c^2 for any c belongs to Z.
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #4 on: Aug 30th, 2006, 12:46pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Aug 30th, 2006, 10:40am, Sameer wrote:

 
Ah in short a^2 + b^2 <> c^2 for any c belongs to Z.
No,  a^2 + b^2 <> k*c^2 for any c belongs to Z.
Many non-squares are still squarefree.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #5 on: Aug 30th, 2006, 6:29pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Is it 2*(a^2 + b^2) or 2n?
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #6 on: Aug 30th, 2006, 7:13pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

No. Since n >= k, kn >= k2, so the sum is >= the sum of all natural numbers up to n, which is n(n+1)/2.  
 
By experiment, here are the values for the first few square-free n:
 
n   -> Sum
2   -> 3
3   -> 6
5   -> 17
6   -> 24
7   -> 32
10 -> 67
11 -> 80
13 -> 113
14 -> 130
15 -> 148
17 -> 193
19 -> 240
21 -> 293
 
 
[e] just realized that I forgot to limit my list to only those n that can be expressed as a sum of squares. I leave it to you to sort out which ones Eigenray is asking about...[/e]
« Last Edit: Aug 30th, 2006, 7:18pm by Icarus » IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #7 on: Aug 31st, 2006, 9:57am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Yes, once again thanks for pointing out my obvious blunders with a big thud... For starters we can always compares the answer for n=13 (4+9), sum=113
or n=5(4+1), sum=17
or n=2(1+1), sum=3... back to drawing board...
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
*****



Pie = pi * e

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1261
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #8 on: Oct 26th, 2006, 11:55pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

*bump* any hints?
IP Logged

"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics.
--Bell, Eric Temple

Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself.
Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #9 on: Oct 27th, 2006, 11:58am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Think on the other side of the box.
IP Logged
Sjoerd Job Postmus
Full Member
***





   


Posts: 228
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #10 on: Oct 27th, 2006, 4:21pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

May I assume it's similar to 2/3*n^2? At least it kind-of looks like it...
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #11 on: Oct 31st, 2006, 4:04pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Nice problem!
 
Experiment with the sum sqrt(kn).
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #12 on: Nov 2nd, 2006, 9:09am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The solution to this lovely problem escapes me...
 
I guess I need another hint...  Roll Eyes
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #13 on: Nov 3rd, 2006, 9:54pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

What is the sum counting?
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #14 on: Dec 16th, 2006, 12:59pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The solution to the given problem involves only elementary number theory; you don't need to know, for example, that n is the product of primes each 1 or 2 mod 4.  And you certainly don't need to understand the following: if we replace n by a prime p which is 3 mod 4, then
 
Sumk=1p floor[sqrt(kp)] = (2p2+1)/3 - h,
 
where h is the class number of the field Q(sqrt(-p)).  This is result is much more advanced.
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #15 on: Dec 18th, 2006, 11:25pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Eigenray, after you supplied so many hints and gave the answer, I still cannot make any progress.
 
Maybe, this problem is too difficult for me.  Roll Eyes
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #16 on: Dec 19th, 2006, 9:39am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Maybe I should have been more direct: evaluate
 
Sumk=1n floor[ k2/n ]
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #17 on: Dec 21st, 2006, 10:24am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Step by step...
 
on Dec 19th, 2006, 9:39am, Eigenray wrote:
Sumk=1n floor[ k2/n ]

I was able to show that under given conditions this sum equals (n2+2)/3.
« Last Edit: Dec 21st, 2006, 10:27am by Barukh » IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #18 on: Dec 24th, 2006, 3:41pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Correct!  So what's the answer to the original problem?
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n)  
« Reply #19 on: Dec 25th, 2006, 9:52am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

My stupidity really has no limits!
 
Denote: sn(k) = floor(k2/n), Sn = k = 1 .. n sn(k) = (n2 + 2)/3 (Eigenray’s auxiliary sum).
 
Then: k = 1 .. n floor(sqrt((kn)) = (!) = k = 1 .. n-1 k [sn(k+1)- sn(k)] + 1 = n2 -  Sn + 1 = (2n2 + 1)/3.
 
Analyzing the blackout, I now understand that it was caused by my willing to derive directly the relation between the two sums: original and Sn (the former being one less than twice the other).
 
To be continued...
 
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board