Author |
Topic: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof (Read 1311 times) |
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
    

Gender: 
Posts: 1291
|
 |
Conditional Probability + Partition Proof
« on: Jan 28th, 2003, 3:44am » |
Quote Modify
|
This is probably not difficult, but I can't seem to get it. The question is to determine whether this statement is true or false, and justify (if true provide proof, if false provide counterexample): where the Ei's form a partition on the sample space. Intuitively I think it is true. We say, given that B has happened, let's look at a particular region of the universe Ei, and then measure the probability of A happening in that region. Then we look at a different region, and another, and another -- with all these regions being disjoint. In the end we add up the contributions from each region toward the probability that A happens, given that B happened. My problem is how to prove the statement formally. I tried doing algebraic manipulation on the right hand side, hoping everything would cancel out to make the left hand side. I applied the identity P(X | Y) = P(X AND Y) / P(Y) a few times. Stuck. Note 1: what is a partition you ask? if you imagine the sample space as some kind of shape like an oval, carve up the shape into pieces. the set of pieces comprise a partition. it's simply a set of jigsaw puzzle pieces that can be fit together to make the whole sample space. formally, the set { Ej } partitions a space S if all the Ej are pairwise disjoint and Union(Ej) = S. Note 2: thanks again to [towr] for super handy latex2png generator
|
« Last Edit: Jan 28th, 2003, 3:57am by william wu » |
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    
 Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender: 
Posts: 13730
|
 |
Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof
« Reply #1 on: Jan 28th, 2003, 8:46am » |
Quote Modify
|
we have P(A|B) = sum(P(A|Ei)*P(Ei|B), i) which expands to P(A AND B)/P(B) = sum(P(A AND Ei)/ P(Ei) * P(Ei AND B)/P(B), i) Suppose there is only one partition, then Ei is always true, and we're left with P(A AND B)/P(B) = P(A) * P(B)/P(B) P(A AND B) = P(A) * P(B) which isn't true in general.. but only when A and B are independant stochastic variables..
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
    

Gender: 
Posts: 1291
|
 |
Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof
« Reply #2 on: Jan 28th, 2003, 3:53pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I don't think that constitutes a proof because it only works for the case where there is only one partition ... ?
|
« Last Edit: Jan 28th, 2003, 3:53pm by william wu » |
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
    

Gender: 
Posts: 1291
|
 |
Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof
« Reply #3 on: Jan 28th, 2003, 4:47pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Ah I think I may know how to prove it. Use the following fact: P(A) = sumi [ P(Ei) P(A|Ei) ]
|
« Last Edit: Jan 28th, 2003, 4:48pm by william wu » |
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    
 Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender: 
Posts: 4863
|
 |
Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof
« Reply #4 on: Jan 28th, 2003, 5:35pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Towr was not proving the formula - he disproved it: If A and B are not independent, then the formula is false, at least for a single partition.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ... And e is just as cursed. I wonder: Which is larger When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
    

Gender: 
Posts: 1291
|
 |
Re: Conditional Probability + Partition Proof
« Reply #5 on: Jan 28th, 2003, 5:39pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Oh, whoops. Hmm, I guess my intuition isn't too hot. Thanks guys.
|
« Last Edit: Jan 28th, 2003, 5:40pm by william wu » |
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
|