wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Proof that 1>1 »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 28th, 2024, 2:49pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   hard
(Moderators: Eigenray, william wu, Icarus, towr, ThudnBlunder, SMQ, Grimbal)
   Proof that 1>1
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Proof that 1>1  (Read 1794 times)
Miguel Z
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 1
Proof that 1>1  
« on: Feb 19th, 2006, 11:07am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

just stumbled upon this site. i think it's great! nice work!
 
here's one little problem that I found in a complex analysis book. it is similar to the 0=1 problem. this one also does require a little bit of math, but it should be very easy if you know complex analysis.
 
first of, for those not familiar with complex analysis, note that  e^(2 pi i) = 1. now for the "proof":
 
1 > e^(-4 pi^2)
   = e^(2 pi i)(2 pi i)
   = [e^(2 pi i)]^(2 pi i)
   = 1^(2 pi i)
   = 1
 
therefore, 1>1. where's the flaw?  
 
cheers!
Miguel
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #1 on: Feb 19th, 2006, 11:45am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

There are some similar "calculations" that have come up before, but they are deeply buried now, so it is good to see the same trick brought forward again.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
oh_boy
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 34
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #2 on: Apr 6th, 2006, 8:28pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Feb 19th, 2006, 11:07am, Miguel Z wrote:
[e^(2 pi i)]^(2 pi i)
 

2 pi i = 0, so what is 00? Tongue
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #3 on: Apr 8th, 2006, 4:34pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Apr 6th, 2006, 8:28pm, oh_boy wrote:
2 pi i = 0, so what is 00?

 
Huh
2i does not equal 0. Indeed, |2i| > 6.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #4 on: Apr 15th, 2006, 9:19pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I thought the flaw happened because we can't make a little house with the > and = characters.
See, =>, >=, >=>, =>=. I can't get the roof up.  
 
Oh, wait .  1^1 . That's it.
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
shadebreeze
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 5
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #5 on: Jun 16th, 2006, 6:47am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Can you extend the same power properties for real numbers to complex numbers?
I would say they have to be redefined, and the
e^((2pi i)(2pi i)) = (e^(2pi i))^(2pi i)
equation might be wrong in the complex plane.
 
However, I am just guessing, I studied complex analysis long ago and I don't remember it very well.
IP Logged
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #6 on: Jun 16th, 2006, 3:09pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

You can and you can't. The problem is, in the complex plane exponentiation is multi-valued. That is, there is more than one number a for which a = bc makes sense. In the special case that the base b is positive real, we have a "preferred value" that we normally use. But even in this case it is not the only one.
 
The various rules of exponentiation can still be said to hold, in the sense that both sides of the equation will give a value that is valid for "bc", but sometimes the values that they settle on are not the same.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
srn437
Newbie
*



the dark lord rises again....

   


Posts: 1
Re: Proof that 1>1  
« Reply #7 on: Sep 1st, 2007, 2:57pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

(e^2(pi)(i))^2(pi)(i) does not equal e^2(pi)(i)(2)(pi)(i). It would if it didn't involve complex numbers.
« Last Edit: Sep 3rd, 2007, 8:41pm by srn437 » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board