Author |
Topic: 6 digit number... (Read 2014 times) |
|
h2
Newbie
Gender: 
Posts: 6
|
 |
6 digit number...
« on: May 16th, 2005, 9:59am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
hi,
Im new to the forum, it looks good tho.
Anyway, ive got a riddle that very few people have acually solved yet, and I want to know if any of you guys can solve it, here it is...
I'm thinking of a 6-digit number. The sum of the digits is 43. And only two of the following three statements about the number are true:
(1) it's a square number.
(2) it's a cube number.
(3) the number is under 500000.
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: 6 digit number...
« Reply #1 on: May 16th, 2005, 10:28am » |
Quote Modify
|
The easy way to solve it would be to get a computer to try all possibilities (which isn't all that much)
Of course a more clever approach would be more satisfying.
One thing's for sure, it's not a multiple of 3.
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Sjoerd Job Postmus
Full Member
Posts: 228
|
|
Re: 6 digit number...
« Reply #2 on: May 17th, 2005, 5:54am » |
Quote Modify
|
9+9+9+9 = 36... so it's easy to see that there are a maximum of 4 9's.
There's a maximum of 5 8's.
maximum of 5 7's, because 6*7 = 42, but can't have this.
77778 could be possible, though.
But, the first digit is < 5. Let's make it a four, and distribute the 3 among the last four digits, except the 8.
499993. would be the largest number satisfying the constraints.
Now, it might be clever to instead of walking through all numbers from 100000 to 500000, to walk from crt(100000) to crt(499993)... After all, it has to be a cube root, and a square root.
Programmatical approach:
FOR i = 46 TO 80 {
int i;
IF ( has_sqrt(cube(i)) && digsum(cube(i)) == 43) {
ECHO cube(i);
}
}
defining digsum:
digsum(int i) {
int sum = 0;
WHILE (i) {
sum += i MOD 10;
i = (i - (i MOD 10)) / 10;
}
return sum;
}
of course, this's pseudocode, and would only help if you would actually be prepared to code this.
Of course, I'm interested in this problem, as you can see... so I'll get out my compiler now  ...
In fact, a really quick approach told me that cube(i) doesn't yield any results... Too bad  
But, that solved the wrong riddle But, it helped me with one result:
2) is false.
Boredom hit again...
7072 < 500000
|
| « Last Edit: May 17th, 2005, 6:01am by Sjoerd Job Postmus » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
SWF
Uberpuzzler
Posts: 879
|
|
Re: 6 digit number...
« Reply #3 on: May 17th, 2005, 8:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
All perfect cubes are either 0, 1, or 8 modulo 9, so the digits of a cube cannot add to 43. Thus, the number is perfect square less than 500000. The average digit must be pretty large, so start looking at the largest square less than 500000, which is 707*707 = 499849 (easy to do mentally if you know cos(45) = sqrt(.5) = .7071...). Checking the digits shows they sum to 43 - no need to look further.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print