Author |
Topic: Broken bike combination lock problem (Read 11102 times) |
|
Ace_T
Guest
|
 |
Broken bike combination lock problem
« on: Mar 3rd, 2005, 9:10pm » |
 Quote  Modify
 Remove
|
Here's an interesting problem that a friend and I ended up solving more 'visually' than through pure math.
You have a combination bike lock of the type which has 3 rings, each with numbers 1 through 8. Normally with this kind of lock you have to line up 3 numbers in the right order along (say) the top of the lock in order to open it. The number of possible combinations is 8x8x8.
But, this lock is broken in such a way that you only have to match any 2 of the 3 numbers in order to open it. Obviously you could do it in 64 tries (8x8) by just using any 2 of the rings, but surely you can do better than that.
1. What is the minimum number of combinations you have to try to ensure that you can open the lock?
2. What is the general solution for a 3-ring lock 'broken' as above, but with 'n' numbers on each ring
a) if 'n' is even?
b) if 'n' is odd?
(for a basic diagram of what this kind of lock looks like, see http://www.securityworld.com/recreation/NS91569.html for an example.)
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
markr
Junior Member
Gender: 
Posts: 90
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #1 on: Mar 3rd, 2005, 11:42pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Since each combination tried eliminates 3n-2 combinations, the theoretical minimum is ceiling((n^3)/(3n-2)).
For the given problem, the minimum is no less than 24.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Ace_T
Guest
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #3 on: Mar 4th, 2005, 8:53am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Yes, looks like the chessboard problem. I see there that someone postulated that the solution is:
S = N2/2 for N even
S = (N2 + 1)/2 for N odd
Not sure of that notation, but the solution I came up with is
S = 2(N/2)**2 = (N**2)/2 for N even (I assume that's what was meant above)
S = (N**2+1)/2 for N odd
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #4 on: Mar 4th, 2005, 3:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
If you are refering to Barukh's post in the other thread, the problem may be that your browser is not able to show superscripts, because Barukh has the exponents properly superscripted in his post:
S = N2/2 for N even
S = (N2 + 1)/2 for N odd
but you have dropped them in your copy.
If those two lines look the same to you as the ones you posted, then you need to find a better browser!
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 7th, 2005, 4:52pm by Icarus » |
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
Ace_T
Guest
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock - visualization
« Reply #5 on: Mar 6th, 2005, 4:44pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
The superscripts show up fine...must have been the settings on my work browser.
One thing I found interesting was how to visualize this problem. I have a diagram that goes with the description below, but am not sure how to post it (or if it's even possible?)
Basically, you start with an 8 x 8 x 8 cube. Each guess at a combination 'cuts out' a line of 1 x 1 x 1 cubes in each of the 'x', 'y' and 'z' directions from the specific (x, y, z) cube selected. If your guesses have completely covered the volume of the 8 x 8 x 8 cube you have a solution.
What is interesting is that when you see this visually, you can see that all guesses where (say) x, y, z <= 4 will carve out a '3-dimensional L' shape. Then, you only need to make guesses in the x, y, z >4 quadrant to complete the solution. If you look at a 2 x 2 x 2 cube first it's easier to see this '3-dimensional L' shape.
So, the number of guesses you need to cover the x, y, z <= 4 quadrant cannot be less than 16 (the area of any 4 x 4 'end' to the 3-dimensional L). It's easy to see there are many solutions of 16, so the full solution is 16+16=32.
For an n x n x n cube where n is odd, a similar approach gives the solution (noting that the two quadrants you are selecting in should be as near to the median as possible, so for a 9 x 9 x 9 cube you could select 16 guesses in the x, y, z <= 4 quadrant, and 25 guesses in the x, y, z >4 quadrant.
So, anyone able to visualize this in one more dimension and get a solution for n x n x n x n? 
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 2276
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock - visualization
« Reply #6 on: Mar 7th, 2005, 6:22am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Mar 6th, 2005, 4:44pm, Ace_T wrote:| I have a diagram that goes with the description below, but am not sure how to post it (or if it's even possible?) |
|
File attachements were possible before this forum has been upgraded with new software. We all hope this feature will be restored shortly.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #7 on: Mar 7th, 2005, 4:59pm » |
Quote Modify
|
If you have another website you can put the image on, then you can use the img tags: [img]image url here[/img] to post the image here. Unfortunately, the ability to post them here directly is waiting on William to find time to restore it. Having once been a grad student myself, I know that this may be awhile. 
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 7th, 2005, 5:00pm by Icarus » |
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
Altamira_64
Junior Member
Posts: 116
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #9 on: Jan 31st, 2016, 8:59am » |
Quote Modify
|
So if each digit only gets values 1, 2 and 3, the minimum number of tries is 5? How can we pick the right 5 combinations which will open all 27?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #10 on: Feb 28th, 2016, 8:34am » |
Quote Modify
|
The combination has 3 digits. It either has two digits in the set {1,2} or it has 2 digits in the set {3}.
To cover the first case, try 111, 122, 212, 221.
To cover the second case, try 222 333.
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 1st, 2016, 1:27pm by Grimbal » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler
    
Gender:
Posts: 2873
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #11 on: Feb 28th, 2016, 2:18pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Feb 28th, 2016, 8:34am, Grimbal wrote:The combination has 3 digits. It either has two digits in the set {1,2} or it has 2 digits in the set {3}.
To cover the first case, try 111, 122, 212, 221.
To cover the second case, try 222.
|
|
Or, to actually cover the second case, try 333.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #12 on: Mar 1st, 2016, 1:40pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Er... and this was a demonstration of how peer-review improves the quality of a publication. Thanks for your collaboration. 
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Hippo
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 919
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #13 on: Mar 9th, 2016, 9:20am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Mar 4th, 2005, 12:44am, Grimbal wrote:
I would replace second 413 with 431  ,
and 243 should be probably replaced by 242 ... and the same with second 857 and 875, and 687 replaced with 686.
But I agree with the posts mentioning 32 as the solution ... and the generalised one.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #14 on: Mar 10th, 2016, 8:11am » |
Quote Modify
|
It took you TEN ELEVEN years to notice ? ? ? 
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 10th, 2016, 8:13am by Grimbal » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Altamira_64
Junior Member
Posts: 116
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #15 on: Mar 11th, 2016, 12:36am » |
Quote Modify
|
Another one:
111
122
233
312
321
on Mar 1st, 2016, 1:40pm, Grimbal wrote:| Er... and this was a demonstration of how peer-review improves the quality of a publication. Thanks for your collaboration. |
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Hippo
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 919
|
|
Re: Broken bike combination lock problem
« Reply #16 on: Mar 11th, 2016, 9:29am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Mar 10th, 2016, 8:11am, Grimbal wrote:It took you TEN ELEVEN years to notice ? ? ? |
|
But I was not around several of them
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print