Author |
Topic: Infinite Grid of Sticks (Read 1198 times) |
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
Gender:
Posts: 1291
|
|
Infinite Grid of Sticks
« on: Dec 10th, 2003, 10:26pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Imagine planting a pole into every point with integral coordinates on the 2D cartesian plane, except for the origin at (0,0). Now imagine that you are standing exactly at the origin. You cannot move from the origin, but you are allowed to rotate in place. What proportion of the infinitude of sticks are visible to your eyes? (In other words, what proportion of the sticks could you hit by shooting a unobstructed ray from the origin?)
|
|
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Infinite Grid of Sticks
« Reply #1 on: Dec 11th, 2003, 12:29am » |
Quote Modify
|
::My first guess would be about the proportion that is relatively prime, since any (x,y) blocks the view of (ax,ay) for integers a > 1. ::
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: Infinite Grid of Sticks
« Reply #2 on: Dec 11th, 2003, 12:37am » |
Quote Modify
|
6/pi2 it is then.
|
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2003, 12:38am by Eigenray » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Infinite Grid of Sticks
« Reply #3 on: Dec 11th, 2003, 12:41am » |
Quote Modify
|
yep.. That's what I found at mathworld as well.. I'm not sure how to derive it though.. I can't find Castellanos' paper online anywhere either.. (The only calculation I can find isn't much better than just giving the answer)
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: Infinite Grid of Sticks
« Reply #4 on: Dec 11th, 2003, 12:52am » |
Quote Modify
|
Roughly, the probability that m and n are both divisible by p is 1/p2, and since these are independent for p prime, the desired probability is: [prod]p prime (1-1/p2) = 1/[prod]1/(1-1/p2) = 1/[prod](1+1/p2 + 1/p4 + . . . ) = 1/[sum]n=1[infty] 1/n2 = 1/[zeta](2), since there is a 1-1 correspondence of terms in the product and the sum by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. As for evaluating [zeta](2), Robin Chapman has that dead horse pretty beat (see "Evaluating zeta(2)").
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: Infinite Grid of Sticks
« Reply #6 on: Dec 11th, 2003, 4:29am » |
Quote Modify
|
If I had to guess, I'd say that N(r) is the number of lattice points in a square of side 2r centered at the origin, and N'(r) ~ 4r[sum]k=1r[phi](k)/k is the number of those which are visible. Related problem: Show that there are arbitrarily large circles such that all the poles in the circle are invisible. Related problem: Suppose now that the poles are cylinders with a radius r>0. What's the maximum distance you can see?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|