wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Messy sum of sums »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 24th, 2024, 7:52am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   general problem-solving / chatting / whatever
(Moderators: Grimbal, william wu, SMQ, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder, Icarus, towr)
   Messy sum of sums
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Messy sum of sums  (Read 475 times)
jarls
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 32
Messy sum of sums   Picture_8.png
« on: Aug 30th, 2009, 12:23am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Why does this turn out to be a fraction (not just for displayed values)?
 
 
« Last Edit: Aug 30th, 2009, 12:24am by jarls » IP Logged

towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Messy sum of sums  
« Reply #1 on: Aug 30th, 2009, 1:33am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Because you're adding a finite number of rational numbers.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Obob
Senior Riddler
****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 489
Re: Messy sum of sums  
« Reply #2 on: Aug 30th, 2009, 5:21am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It seems to me you probably have an error in there, though.  One of the terms is (d-(p-1))!, where the range p is evaluated over makes d-(p-1) negative most of the time.  There is no good interpretation for the factorial of a negative number.  This should raise a red flag, unless you are absolutely sure this is intended.
 
In fact, if it wasn't for the last term, you would get an integer for all positive integer inputs.
« Last Edit: Aug 30th, 2009, 5:24am by Obob » IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: Messy sum of sums  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 3rd, 2009, 3:35pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

n! may not be defined for n a negative integer, but 1/n! can be taken to be 0; e.g., C(n,k) = n!/(k! (n-k)!) even if k<0 or k>n.  The problem seems to be the kd-l in the third sum: since l can be as large as d+3, you can get a denominator of k3.
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board