wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Continuous Probability Distributions »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 17th, 2025, 2:02pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   general problem-solving / chatting / whatever
(Moderators: towr, Grimbal, Icarus, SMQ, william wu, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder)
   Continuous Probability Distributions
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Continuous Probability Distributions  (Read 568 times)
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Continuous Probability Distributions  
« on: Nov 16th, 2008, 1:39pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I have two related queries...
 
In conventional probability theory for continuous distributions, P(X=a) = 0 for all real values, a. So does the statement, "The sum of all probable outcomes..." have any meaning?
 
I recall reading a paper many years ago which provided a formal treatment of continuous probabilities and I think that infinitesimals were assigned to particular outcome. However, I cannot find any references now.
 
Does anyone have any knowledge of this?
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Continuous Probability Distributions  
« Reply #1 on: Nov 16th, 2008, 2:22pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 16th, 2008, 1:39pm, Sir Col wrote:
In conventional probability theory for continuous distributions, P(X=a) = 0 for all real values, a. So does the statement, "The sum of all probable outcomes..." have any meaning?
I'd say in this case only integrals have any real meaning. P(X=a) is really aa pdf(X=i)  (where pdf is the probability density function.)
 
So, is the area of under a graph the sum of the areas under each point of a graph?
Can we make something of ab xx f(z) dz dy ? And will it be ab f(x) dy ?
It would seem to imply xx f(z) dz = f(x), which doesn't appear very likely, unless f(x)=0.
 
hmm.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 7527
Re: Continuous Probability Distributions  
« Reply #2 on: Nov 17th, 2008, 5:21am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I have been taught the approach that in the general case, you should consider P(X in S) where S is a set.
 
For discrete cases, it comes down to consider P(X=n) for each n.
 
For continuous cases, you can consider the intervals (-inf,a): P(X < a).
If you call F(x) = P(X < x) you have
    P(x <= X < x+dx) = F(x+dx) - F(x) ~ F'(x)·dx = f(x)·dx.
where
    f(x) = F'(x) is the density function.
 
PS:
And to reply to your question, the fact that the sum over all possible outcomes is 1 is not a rule, but a result.  In fact, you start with
    P(X in A) = 1
where A is the set of all outcomes and you can break it down using
   P(X in (A union B)) = P(X in A) + P(X in B)
where A and B are disjoint.
For the discrete case, you can break it down to a sum over all individual outcomes.  For the continuous case, you can't.
« Last Edit: Nov 17th, 2008, 6:04am by Grimbal » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board