wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Logical List »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 10th, 2025, 3:42am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: towr, Icarus, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder, SMQ, Grimbal, william wu)
   Logical List
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Logical List  (Read 797 times)
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Logical List  
« on: Sep 24th, 2008, 2:55pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

1) The number of the first true statement here added to the number of the second false statement gives the number of a statement which is true.
 
2) There are more true statements than false statements.
 
3) The number of the second true statement added to the number of the first false statement gives the number of a statement which is true.
 
4) There are no two consecutive true statements.
 
5) There are at most three false statements.
 
6) If this puzzle consisted of statements 1-5 only then the answer to the following question would be unchanged.
 
Which statements are true?
 
« Last Edit: Sep 24th, 2008, 2:56pm by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Logical List  
« Reply #1 on: Sep 25th, 2008, 12:44am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Mind boggling good, but I've possibly (edit) made a boo-boo...

6 cannot be true as it implies that removing it does not change the number of true statements.
 
If 1 is true then true1+false2 = 4 (there cannot be 5 or 6 true statements as there would be no 2nd false). But as false2 = 6 the number of true statements would exceed 6.
As 1 is a false complex sentence we can infer nothing of value from it.
 
If 2 is true (and 1 and 6 are false) then there must be four true statements: 2, 3, 4, and 5. But 3 and 4 cannot be true as 4 contadicts it, so our supposition was wrong and 2 must be false. This implies that there are not more true than false statements, which means there are 0, 1, 2, or 3 true statements.
 
If 3 is true then true2+false1 >= 5, which cannot be true. So 3 must be false.
 
If 4 is true (and 1-3 and 6 are false) then 5 cannot be true, which means that only statement 4 is true.
 
If 5 is true (and 1-4 and 6 are false) then we encounter a contadiction.
 
Hence we conclude that there is one true statement: 4.
« Last Edit: Sep 25th, 2008, 5:22am by Sir Col » IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 7527
Re: Logical List  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 25th, 2008, 2:59am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 25th, 2008, 12:44am, Sir Col wrote:
If 1 is true then true1+false2 = 4 (there cannot be 5 or 6 true statements as there would be no 2nd false). But as false2 = 6 the number of true statements would exceed 6.

I am not sure we interpret sentence 1 in the same way.  It seems that to you," true1+false2" gives the number of true statements.  To me, it gives the ordinal number of a sentence that is true.  If 1 is true and 2, 3 are false, then 1+3=4 and 4 must be true.
IP Logged
SMQ
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2084
Re: Logical List  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 25th, 2008, 5:01am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I agree with Grimbal, finding TFFTFF to be the only solution in which all statements have well-determined truth values.  If the answers to 1 through 5 are FFFTF then statement 6 reduces to "this statement is false".
 
--SMQ
IP Logged

--SMQ

Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Logical List  
« Reply #4 on: Sep 25th, 2008, 5:20am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 25th, 2008, 2:59am, Grimbal wrote:

I am not sure we interpret sentence 1 in the same way.

Duh!  Embarassed
 
Your guess was right too. I had (mis)read it as "the number of statements" as opposed to what it actually says, "the number of a statement".
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
Noke Lieu
Uberpuzzler
*****



pen... paper... let's go! (and bit of plastic)

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1884
Re: Logical List  
« Reply #5 on: Sep 25th, 2008, 10:22pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 25th, 2008, 12:44am, Sir Col wrote:
Mind boggling good,

 
 
I have to agree with that.  Grin
I am unsure of whether I should pity TnB for coming up with it though... (whether you found it, or whether making it was easier than solving it...?)
« Last Edit: Sep 25th, 2008, 10:23pm by Noke Lieu » IP Logged

a shade of wit and the art of farce.
vallenato
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 4
Re: Logical List  
« Reply #6 on: Oct 24th, 2008, 12:44pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

if you take:
 5 statements in this order:V-F-V-F-V
 Smiley7 statements:V-F-V-F-V-F-V Smiley
« Last Edit: Oct 24th, 2008, 12:50pm by vallenato » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board