wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Chain Link 21 »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 28th, 2024, 12:37pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: SMQ, towr, Grimbal, william wu, Icarus, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder)
   Chain Link 21
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Chain Link 21  (Read 1034 times)
larivlan
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 2
Chain Link 21  
« on: Dec 6th, 2007, 8:06am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I need help on the Chain Link 21 riddle, if you could help me out that would be great
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #1 on: Dec 6th, 2007, 8:35am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It might have been helpful to post the puzzle, so people don't have to look it up.
Quote:
What is the least number of links you can cut in a chain of 21 links to be able to give someone all possible number of links up to 21?

 
 
It seems open to interpretation whether you actually cut the links loose, or whether the idea is just unlink them (the difference being that if you start with say a chain of 5 links, you might end up with e.g. 2+2+the cut one, or 2 and 3)
 
My guesses (i.e without proof of optimality)
1 2 4 6 8 -> so 4 'cuts' (unlinking)
1 1 + 3 6 10 -> 2 'cuts' (with cut links kept loose)

 
 
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
FiBsTeR
Senior Riddler
****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 581
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #2 on: Dec 6th, 2007, 2:15pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think 4 cuts is optimal for the first case, since if there were only 3 cuts, there could be, at most, only 4 distinct lengths of "subchains", which can result in only 24-1 = 15 (you can't give him nothing...) different combinations you could make, whereas you need 21.
 
EDIT: If the interpretation is as towr also suggested, in which a cut leaves 3 "subchains", 2 cuts is also optimal, since it would result in 5 "subchains" (at most 4 distinct), in which the total number of combinations is, at most, 3*23 - 1 = 23. One cut would allow you, at most, only 8 combinations. Seeing the other thread, there is indeed a solution for this (which is also towr's, upon looking again).
« Last Edit: Dec 6th, 2007, 2:36pm by FiBsTeR » IP Logged
Hippo
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 919
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #3 on: Dec 7th, 2007, 7:34am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Dec 6th, 2007, 8:35am, towr wrote:

My guesses (i.e without proof of optimality)

1 1 + 3 6 10 -> 2 'cuts' (with cut links kept loose)


 
There are problems with lengths 9, 13, 16, ....
« Last Edit: Dec 7th, 2007, 7:35am by Hippo » IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #4 on: Dec 7th, 2007, 7:37am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Dec 7th, 2007, 7:34am, Hippo wrote:
There are problems with lengths 9, 13, 16, ....
How? is 9 not 3+6, 13 not 3+10? 16 not 6+10?
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
larivlan
Newbie
*





   


Posts: 2
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #5 on: Dec 7th, 2007, 8:01am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Two cuts is what I got as well, but what about a 63 link chain, can it be done in 3 cuts?
IP Logged
FiBsTeR
Senior Riddler
****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 581
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #6 on: Dec 7th, 2007, 9:42am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Why not just {1,1,1,4,8,16,32}?
IP Logged
Hippo
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 919
Re: Chain Link 21  
« Reply #7 on: Dec 11th, 2007, 12:22am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Dec 7th, 2007, 7:37am, towr wrote:

How? is 9 not 3+6, 13 not 3+10? 16 not 6+10?

 
I probably understand the problem another way ... what about when you are asked to create a chain from the pieces without additional cutting.  
If there are chains of 3 uncut and 6 uncut pieces there is no way to connect them without further cutting...
 
But with 2 cuts there are 3 "uncut chains" and you can get:
 (no cut, one uncut) 3+
(one cut, one uncut) 3+
(one cut, two uncut) 3+
(two cut, one uncut) 3+
(two cut, two uncut) 3+
(two cut, three uncut) 1+
(one cut, no uncut) 1+
(two cut, no uncut) 1+
at most 18 distinct positive lengths alltogether so 21 cannot be achieved.
« Last Edit: Dec 11th, 2007, 12:31am by Hippo » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board