Author |
Topic: Prodigitious digits (Read 1096 times) |
|
pcbouhid
Uberpuzzler
    


Gender: 
Posts: 647
|
 |
Prodigitious digits
« on: Jan 10th, 2006, 8:05am » |
Quote Modify
|
For a positive integer n, let P(n) be the product of the nonzero base 10 digits of n. Call n "prodigitious" if P(n) divides n. What is the maximum number of consecutive prodigitious positive integers n?
|
« Last Edit: Jan 10th, 2006, 8:06am by pcbouhid » |
IP Logged |
Don´t follow me, I´m lost too.
|
|
|
JohanC
Senior Riddler
   

Posts: 460
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #1 on: Jan 10th, 2006, 2:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
13
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    

Gender: 
Posts: 7527
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #3 on: Jan 11th, 2006, 9:06am » |
Quote Modify
|
Depends how you feel about zero, I guess.
|
« Last Edit: Jan 11th, 2006, 9:07am by Grimbal » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
JohanC
Senior Riddler
   

Posts: 460
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #4 on: Jan 11th, 2006, 11:15am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 11th, 2006, 9:06am, Grimbal wrote: Depends how you feel about zero, I guess. |
| Not really. I'll give some very big hints: - There never can be more than 13 consecutive numbers. The numbers ending in 3, 6 or 9 should be divisible by 3. So if N+3 ends with 3 and is divisible by 3, N+6 will end in 6 and be divisible by 3 as well as N+9 will end in 9 and will also be divisible by 3. But N+13 nor N-1cann't be. - For two "prodigitious" numbers N and N+1 to be consecutive, all digits except the last one should be either 1 or 0. If there would be any other digit D it is impossible for both N and N+1 to be divisible by D. - In the following, let N be such a number consisting of only 1's and 0's, ending in 0. - Such numbers N+D ending with D=0,1,2 or 5 are quite trivial. This extends easily to N+10, N+11 and N+12. - Numbers ending in D=4 will be divisible by 4 if there is at least one zero just before. Similarly for numbers ending in 8, two preceding zeros are needed. So our initial N should end with at least 3 zeros. - Numbers N+D ending in D=9 will need their sum of digits be a multiple of 9. So the number of 1's in N needs to be a multiple of 9. Automatically will N+3 be divisible by 3 an N+6 be divisible by 6. - The only more elaborate case to be considered is D=7. As N=0 is not allowed due to the positiveness constraint, we basically need a number N consisting of 9 (or 18 or 27 or ...) 1's with possibly some 0's in between, and 3 0's at the end. And that is divisible by 7 (N mod 7 = 1). - The smallest number to consider is 111111111000, but that is not be divisible by 7. - One digit more puts one 0 somewhere in between. Basically this can be written as N = 1111111111000 - 10k where there are ten 1's in the first number and k > 2 and k < 12. Then N mod 7 = 1111111111000 mod 7 - 10k mod 7 = 2 - 3k mod 7 to be divisible by 7, which is true for k = 8. So N=1111011111000 seems to be the first number leading to 13 subsequent "prodigitious" numbers.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    
 Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender: 
Posts: 13730
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #5 on: Jan 11th, 2006, 2:23pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Nicely done. My brute force search didn't quite get that high
|
« Last Edit: Jan 11th, 2006, 2:23pm by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
pcbouhid
Uberpuzzler
    


Gender: 
Posts: 647
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #6 on: Jan 11th, 2006, 2:59pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Good work indeed, JC.
|
|
IP Logged |
Don´t follow me, I´m lost too.
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    

Gender: 
Posts: 7527
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #7 on: Jan 12th, 2006, 3:28am » |
Quote Modify
|
Aah. Very good. I already felt the solution with the sequence starting at 1 is a little too easy.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    
 Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender: 
Posts: 13730
|
 |
Re: Prodigitious digits
« Reply #8 on: Jan 12th, 2006, 6:01am » |
Quote Modify
|
As far as I know, the original question was to prove that a sequence of 14 is not possible. But that didn't show 13 was possible.
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
|