wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Resistors »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Mar 14th, 2025, 11:49am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: ThudnBlunder, Eigenray, Grimbal, Icarus, william wu, SMQ, towr)
   Resistors
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Resistors  (Read 669 times)
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Resistors  
« on: Oct 15th, 2004, 6:03am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

On an infinite 2D rectangular lattice of 1-ohm resistors, what is the resistance between any two nodes that are a knight's move apart?
 
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2004, 6:04am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
TenaliRaman
Uberpuzzler
*****



I am no special. I am only passionately curious.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1001
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #1 on: Oct 17th, 2004, 11:23am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I wonder why u put this in easy  Huh
 
::
assuming u mean diagonally opposite vertices
2/pi
::
IP Logged

Self discovery comes when a man measures himself against an obstacle - Antoine de Saint Exupery
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 7527
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #2 on: Oct 17th, 2004, 1:23pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Numerically, I find 0.773239545 but I might be wrong.
IP Logged
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #3 on: Oct 17th, 2004, 9:21pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
I wonder why u put this in easy

Because I'm too dumb to know how hard it is.   Undecided
 
Quote:
assuming u mean diagonally opposite vertices  
2/pi ::

But not dumb enough to believe your answer.  Tongue
 
« Last Edit: Oct 20th, 2004, 3:17am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #4 on: Oct 20th, 2004, 2:29am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

As TenaliRaman said, this is far from being easy.  
 
[smiley=square.gif]
I’ve found the solution in rec.puzzles archive, under physics section. There is a nice argument to find the resistance between two adjacent vertices – it equals .5. The main difficulty is to find the resistance between two diagonally adjacent vertices – the answer was given by TenaliRaman. The only satisfactory proof of this result I've seen is far from being elementary – look here.  
 
Then, using the superposition, the question posted may be answered: 4/[pi] - .5, the number numerically calculated by Grimbal.
[smiley=square.gif]
 
Grimbal, how did you find it?
IP Logged
SWF
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Posts: 879
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #5 on: Oct 20th, 2004, 6:03pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A similar but much easier question was discussed in the Hard Forum: Infinite Resistor Network.  
IP Logged
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 7527
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #6 on: Oct 21st, 2004, 6:36am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I modelled a big grid a[i,j] for i, j in -399..399
I set a[0,0] = 1 and computed a[i,j] = (a[i-1][j] + a[i+1,j] + a[i,j-1] + a[i,j+1])/4 for all [i,j] except [0,0], and fixing the border cells to 0, until it converged.
(Actually, I only computed 1/8th of the grid, adjusting border formulas.)
This models a grid where the voltage is 1 in the middle and 0 on the border.  I get the voltage for each cell and I can compute the current that leaves the center cell just from the voltage of the neighbours.
 
Then I imagine I superpose 2 such grids centered on (0,0) and (2,1), one added and the other subtracted.  The current leaving from (0,0) and entering (2,0) is the same as the current computed above, and the currents nearly cancel near the border.  (If you have a single entry in the middle, then the current thru the border is non-zero.  With 2 entries, the outgoing and incoming currents nearly cancel out)
Then, I can easily compute the voltage difference between (0,0) and (2,1) and so, I get the equivalent resistance.
 
In short, It is equivalent to forcing cell (0,0) to 1 volt, forcing cell (2,1) to -1 volt, and solving all other cells to be the average of the 4 neighbours.  From there, you can compute the current leaving (0,0) and the voltage difference.
 
I did a second run with a smaller grid to estimate how many digits are correct in the solution.
« Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2004, 6:50am by Grimbal » IP Logged
Emul P Edmon
Newbie
*






   


Gender: male
Posts: 21
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #7 on: Oct 26th, 2004, 9:54am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Roll Eyes A mental excersize can be used to narrow it down to somewhere between 0.5 and 1.0 ohms.  How?  (a) As a lower limit, look at each spray of four resistors from the two nodes in question.  No matter what the circuitry is external to those, there is at least 0.25 ohms between each node and the external world.  If the start node (of the knight's move) and the end node are each 0.25 ohms away from anything else then they must be at least 0.5 ohms away from each other.  (b) For an upper limit, consider that each square of four resistors has a 1 ohm resistance across its diagonal (two 2-ohm resistors in parallel).  Without reusing any resistor it is easy to find the following shortest paths between the two knight's move nodes: (2 ohms, 4 ohms, 4 ohms, etc.)  Just using the first three in parallel results in 1.0 ohms.   I just wish I had the patience to solve it correctly, the way you did, however.
« Last Edit: Oct 26th, 2004, 9:57am by Emul P Edmon » IP Logged
JocK
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 877
Re: Resistors  
« Reply #8 on: Jan 7th, 2005, 4:43pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/9909/9909120.pdf
IP Logged

solving abstract problems is like sex: it may occasionally have some practical use, but that is not why we do it.

xy - y = x5 - y4 - y3 = 20; x>0, y>0.
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board