Author |
Topic: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2)))*.. (Read 758 times) |
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender: 
Posts: 13730
|
 |
sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2)))*..
« on: Oct 21st, 2003, 1:48am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
Probably too simple, but what is
[sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * ...
|
|
 IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #1 on: Oct 21st, 2003, 2:04am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 21st, 2003, 1:48am, towr wrote:
Probably...
::
Define A = [sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * ...
But:
[sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * ... = [sqrt][(1/2) * [sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * ...] = [sqrt][(1/2)*A]
So A=[sqrt][(1/2)A]
A2=0.5A.
A > 0
Hence A = 1/2
::
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2003, 2:06am by BNC » |
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #2 on: Oct 21st, 2003, 2:57am » |
Quote Modify
|
There is another way to solve it, which is probably more usefull in general..
try this one:
[e]euhm, let's limit that to n factors  [/e]
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2003, 3:05am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
Gender:
Posts: 1291
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #3 on: Oct 21st, 2003, 4:55am » |
Quote Modify
|
BNC, that proof is too complicated 
[sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * [sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt][sqrt](1/2) * ...
= (1/2)1/2*(1/2)1/4*(1/2)1/8*...
= (1/2)[sum]2^-k | k = 1 to inf
= (1/2)1
= 1/2
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2003, 4:58am by william wu » |
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #4 on: Oct 21st, 2003, 5:47pm » |
Quote Modify
|
You can come up with a nice finite limit for the infinite sequence in towr's second challenge if 0 [le] A < 1.
An advantage William's approach has over BNC's is that BNC simply assumes the series converges. But William's approach can be made to show that it does.
This is more critical than you might think. I have seen many divergent sequences such that if you assume that there is a limit, you will be able to come up with a nice answer for what that limit is from the sequence's definition, much as BNC did. Unfortunately, that answer is meaningless unless you are a particle physicist!
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #5 on: Oct 22nd, 2003, 12:38am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 21st, 2003, 5:47pm, Icarus wrote:| You can come up with a nice finite limit for the infinite sequence in towr's second challenge if 0 [le] A < 1. |
|
Yes, but unfortunately that send the wrong message, because I wanted to convey that the approach of "every factor is smaller than 1 thus it converges to 0" doesn't allways work.. (of course no one here fell for it)
Thanks btw for having taught me how to properly deal with converging infinite products  (long ago in another thread)
A = e is also a nice case (without n going to [infty] of course)..
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 22nd, 2003, 12:40am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #6 on: Oct 22nd, 2003, 3:32pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 22nd, 2003, 12:38am, towr wrote:| Yes, but unfortunately that send the wrong message, because I wanted to convey that the approach of "every factor is smaller than 1 thus it converges to 0" doesn't allways work.. (of course no one here fell for it) |
|
I'm not sure how that would apply here, since it does converge to zero when A < 1, though not simply because every term is less than 1!
Quote:| Thanks btw for having taught me how to properly deal with converging infinite products (long ago in another thread) |
|
You're welcome! It's nice to know that something I said made sense at some point!
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
SWF
Uberpuzzler
Posts: 879
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #7 on: Oct 22nd, 2003, 7:21pm » |
Quote Modify
|
This reminds me of the Nested Radicals riddle. That one also had people driving Icarus up the walls by ignoring convergence yet still coming up with the correct answer.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #8 on: Oct 22nd, 2003, 7:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
It was not coming up with the right answer that was a problem. If an answer exists, the techniques employed will definitely find it. Their only downfall is that if a solution does not exist, they will still give an answer without any indication that it is purely garbage.
These functional equation solutions identify what could be called "equilibrium points" of an iterated process. But they will not tell you if the equilibrium point is a stable or unstable one. If its stable, the sequence will converge to it nicely. If it is unstable, and no stable point exists, the sequence will diverge. Hence, a complete solution to any such problem has to include some sort of proof of convergence.
I have to admit that I don't see what is particularly interesting about ee1/2e1/3e1/4...
Of course, Hn = [sum]k=1n 1/k approximates ln(n+1), so you would assume some connection, but looking at the numbers produced shows nothing to me that makes it more interesting than any other value of A.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: sqrt(1/2)*sqrt(sqrt(1/2))*sqrt(sqrt(sqrt(1/2))
« Reply #9 on: Oct 22nd, 2003, 11:10pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 22nd, 2003, 7:46pm, Icarus wrote:| Of course, Hn = [sum]k=1n 1/k approximates ln(n+1), so you would assume some connection, but looking at the numbers produced shows nothing to me that makes it more interesting than any other value of A. |
|
meh.. perhaps you're right.. it wouldn't be the first time
Dividing by eeuler_gamma helps to make it look nicer though.. And if you floor it you just get n back..
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print