wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - Centigrade to Fahreheit »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 26th, 2024, 11:32pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: ThudnBlunder, Grimbal, william wu, Eigenray, Icarus, towr, SMQ)
   Centigrade to Fahreheit
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Centigrade to Fahreheit  (Read 651 times)
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« on: Oct 5th, 2003, 3:18am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Converting 275oC to Fahrenheit we get 527oF. In fact, we could have just moved the 5 to the front.
 
What is the next largest example where moving the last digit to the front gives the right answer?
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2003, 4:19am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #1 on: Oct 5th, 2003, 4:21am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Once again, a lovely puzzle, T&B.
 
::
It seems that 275oC is the only example!
 
Let us consider 3-digit examples, C=100x+10y+z.
 
F=9C/5+32=180x+18y+9z/5+32, and we are trying to find this equal to 100z+10x+y.
 
Equating and tidying up, 85(10x+y)+160=491z.
 
So z must be divisible by 5; but this was obvious from the fact that F=9C/5+32, and C must divide by 5 to obtain integer F. However, we also know that z[ne]0, as this would produce a 2-digit number, by placing the zero at the front. Hence z=5.
 
Therefore, 85(10x+y)=2295, giving 17(10x+y)=459[equiv]0 mod 9. Hence, 10x+y[equiv]0 mod 9, so, x+y[equiv]0 mod 9.
 
That is, we're looking for, C, a 3-digit number of the form xy5, where x+y[equiv]0 mod 9. A quick test of possibilities fails in each case: 365, 455, 545. However, C[ge]545 produces F with 4-digits.
 
My logical is a little faulty from here, but I will be bold enough to claim that no more solutions exist. It is faulty, because there remains a possibility that, F, having more digits than C, may end in zero, in which case it would produce a number with the same number of digits as C.
 
Can anyone finish off my proof?
::
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #2 on: Oct 5th, 2003, 4:42am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

For the 3-digit case, I get F = 100z + [(C-z)/10] and we know that z must equal 5.
 
Quote:
Can anyone finish off my proof?

No.  Tongue
 
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2003, 7:55am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #3 on: Oct 5th, 2003, 9:22am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I've tried solving it a little differently

using (10*a+b )*9/5+32= 10^i *b + a (where i is the number of digits in a)
Since it's obvious b=5, we get
18*a+9+32= 10^i *5 + a  
so 17*a = 5 * 10^i - 41
which is easy enough to try and find for different i's.
I haven't found any other number in the range of C-integers (2^32)
 
But I don't yet see any fundamental reason why 5 * 10^i - 41 wouldn't be divisable by 17 for i's over 2.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #4 on: Oct 5th, 2003, 12:59pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Towr, what a clever approach...
::
The problem reduces to finding 5x10i–41[equiv]0 mod 17, or 5x10i[equiv]7 mod 17.
 
Using the good old Windows calculator again, I found 5x1018[equiv]7 mod 17. Therefore a=(5x1018–41)/17=294117647058823527.
 
Hence the next example is, 29411764705882352750C.
::
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #5 on: Oct 5th, 2003, 1:57pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

hmm.. I should have been able to find that.. If I had programmed more cleverly..
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #6 on: Oct 6th, 2003, 3:31am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
hmm.. I should have been able to find that.. If I had programmed more cleverly..

: All the solutions are given by C = 5*(1016m+3 - 65)/17 where m = 0,1,2...  
 
 
« Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2003, 2:56am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #7 on: Oct 6th, 2003, 3:40am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Very clever, T&B, but can you prove that your formula works for all values of m and provides the complete solution set?  Roll Eyes
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #8 on: Oct 6th, 2003, 6:36am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
Very clever, T&B, but can you prove that your formula works for all values of m and provides the complete solution set?

Yes, I can.  Roll Eyes
 
Let C = xn-1*10n-1 + ... + x1*10 + x0  
Then F = x0*10n-1 + (C - x0)/10.
 
F = (9C/5) + 32 => x0 = 5
 
Hence (9C/5) + 32 = 5*10n-1 + [(C - 5)/10]
 
This gives C = 5*(10n - 65)/17
 
As 10 is a primitive root modulo 17, it follows that C is an integer iff n is of the form 16m+3.  
 
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2003, 12:05pm by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #9 on: Oct 6th, 2003, 10:18am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Nice, but could you please explain the last past?
Quote:
As 10 is a primitive root modulo 17, it follows that C is an integer iff n is of the form 16m+3.

IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #10 on: Oct 6th, 2003, 11:28am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
Nice, but could you please explain the last past?  

You asked for a proof. Fair enough, I gave one. But now you are expecting me to understand it??  Roll Eyes
 
OK, here is my primitive attempt:
 
We have C = 5*(10n - 65)/17  
Hence we need 10n = 65 (mod 17)
                           = 14 (mod 17)
 
By Fermat's Little Theorem,  
1016 = 1 (mod 17)  
1016m = 1 (mod 17)
1016m+3 = 1000 (mod 17) = 14 (mod 17)
 
Because 10 is a primitive root mod 17, 1016m+i will run through all possibilities mod 17
Here, i = 3 gives us our 14 (mod 17)
 
 
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2003, 11:45am by ThudnBlunder » IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: Centigrade to Fahreheit  
« Reply #11 on: Oct 6th, 2003, 11:59am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Oct 6th, 2003, 11:28am, THUDandBLUNDER wrote:
OK, here is my primitive attempt

And explained so well, too. Thanks, T&B!
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board