wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - My broken calculator »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 25th, 2024, 11:34am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   easy
(Moderators: Grimbal, Eigenray, ThudnBlunder, towr, Icarus, SMQ, william wu)
   My broken calculator
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: My broken calculator  (Read 602 times)
BNC
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 1732
My broken calculator  
« on: Sep 27th, 2003, 3:09pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

My calculator just broke down. Almost nothing works. In fact, only 3 functions still work:
Function A doubles the current result (res -> 2*res)
Function B adds one to the current result (res -> res + 1)
Function C clears the result (0 -> res)
 
I just pressed C, and the result is 0.
 
1. What is the minimal number of actions required to get a result of 100?
 
2. What is the maximal number that is still smaller than 100, which fulfils the minimax condition: the minimal number of actions required to get it is maximal?
« Last Edit: Sep 27th, 2003, 3:11pm by BNC » IP Logged

How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
Lightboxes
Full Member
***





   


Gender: male
Posts: 203
Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #1 on: Sep 27th, 2003, 11:44pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I'm confused about this one?  It's zero and you hit the C button to get res?
Quote:
(0 -> res)

I hope I don't sound stupid:
1) ::Hit B 3 times, then hit A 3 times, then hit B 1 time then hit A 2 times.
9 times total
2) And if I understood this one correctly...I got 97:
Hit B 1 time, A 1 time, B 1 time, A 5 times, hit B 1 time.
9 times total.
« Last Edit: Sep 27th, 2003, 11:52pm by Lightboxes » IP Logged

A job is not worth doing unless it's worth doing well.
ThudnBlunder
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****




The dewdrop slides into the shining Sea

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4489
Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 28th, 2003, 12:07am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Quote:
I'm confused about this one?  It's zero and you hit the C button to get res?

No, when 'res' (result) is showing you press C to clear so that it now shows zero.
IP Logged

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.....................................................................er, if that's all right with the rest of you.
BNC
Uberpuzzler
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 1732
Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 28th, 2003, 12:48am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 27th, 2003, 11:44pm, Lightboxes wrote:
I'm confused about this one?  It's zero and you hit the C button to get res?

Answered by T&B.
 
Quote:

I hope I don't sound stupid:

Never!
 
Quote:

1) ::<hidden>::

Correct. Now generalize for any number.
hint: A certain observation is the base for an easy answer
 
Quote:

2) And if I understood this one correctly...I got 97:

Let me try to explain. Take any number in the range [1,100]. For every number n, there exist a minimal number of actions required to achieve that n -- call it m(n). Out of the set {m(n), n=1..100}, we define the maximum M=max(m(n), n=1..100). There are a few numbers that fulfill m(n)=M. We're looking for N, that is the maximal number < 100 with m(N)=M.
« Last Edit: Sep 28th, 2003, 12:56am by BNC » IP Logged

How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
Lightboxes
Full Member
***





   


Gender: male
Posts: 203
Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #4 on: Sep 28th, 2003, 8:20pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I would generalize by saying if n equals an even number, then divide by two and continue just before the result is a number with a decimal nn.5, then subract one, then divide by 2's again...then stop right before a result equals nn.5, then subract one...etc.
 
::So...1 would a solution to 2)? and 2, 3?  3 being the max
« Last Edit: Sep 28th, 2003, 8:34pm by Lightboxes » IP Logged

A job is not worth doing unless it's worth doing well.
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
*****





242002184 242002184    


Gender: male
Posts: 727
Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #5 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 3:47am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 28th, 2003, 12:48am, BNC wrote:

Correct. Now generalize for any number.

So we want to get a number n using functions A (*2) and B (+1). First, write n in base 2, e.g. (100)10 = (1100100)2. Now, for every 1 that shows up in the base-2 representation of n, we have to press B once. Function A shifts the ones and zeros one place to the left, inserting a zero at the end. Let's say n has d digits in base 2, o of which are ones (d=7, o=3 for n=100). For every digit (starting from the second), we have to press A once. In the case n = 100, we use the sequence BABAAABAA - which is different from Lightboxes's solution, but probably more easily generalized.
For general n, the minimal number of actions is o + d - 1
.
« Last Edit: Sep 29th, 2003, 3:51am by wowbagger » IP Logged

"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
*****





242002184 242002184    


Gender: male
Posts: 727
Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #6 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 4:09am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I'll try to clarify BNC's explanation on part 2 using an example.
 
Note that the hidden part below is a spoiler for the generalized case of question 1, and possibly a hint for part 2.
 

BNC: "Take any number in the range [1,100]."
I restrict this example to [1,10].
 
BNC: "For every number n, there exist a minimal number of actions required to achieve that n -- call it m(n)."
For the calculation of m(n) from the binary representation of n, see my last post.

  n (decimal)  n (binary)  m(n)
  1  1      1
  2      10      2
  3      11      3
  4     100      3
  5     101      4
  6     110      4
  7     111      5
  8    1000      4
  9    1001      5
 10    1010      5

 
BNC: "Out of the set {m(n), n=1..100}, we define the maximum M=max(m(n), n=1..100)."
In my example, M = 5, because this is the maximum that shows up in the third column above.
 
BNC: "There are a few numbers that fulfill m(n)=M."
These are {7, 9, 10}.
 
BNC: "We're looking for N, that is the maximal number < 100 with m(N)=M."
The maximum of {7, 9, 10} is, of course, 10. In this respect, my example is rather boring. If you extend this to include numbers up to 100, however, it gets more interesting: 63, for example, needs more operations than 100.

 
Hope this helps to understand the mathematical formulation of part 2 BNC gave.
« Last Edit: Sep 29th, 2003, 4:13am by wowbagger » IP Logged

"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
Lightboxes' Clone
Guest

Email

Re: My broken calculator  
« Reply #7 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 7:57am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

I understand it now, now that I look back at BNC's explanation.  I must have been too tired since I came from work yesterday.  And thanks wowbagger.
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board