Author |
Topic: Matches time again (Read 592 times) |
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Matches time again
« on: Jul 9th, 2003, 9:53am » |
Quote Modify
|
Move 3 matches to get a valid equation: |||| - || = ||||
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
Steihl
Guest
|
||||| - | = |||| Oh wait I only moved 1 match.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Guestibe
Guest
|
Do the same as Steihl, but then swap the two rightmost matches. Total of three matches moved. Err... well, it works in a literal sense anyway.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
WombatDeath
Junior Member
Posts: 89
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #3 on: Jul 9th, 2003, 12:36pm » |
Quote Modify
|
How's this: |||| - | + | = ||
|
« Last Edit: Jul 9th, 2003, 12:37pm by WombatDeath » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
SWF
Uberpuzzler
Posts: 879
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #4 on: Jul 9th, 2003, 5:07pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Moving only 2, but you can always add a trivial move, like moving the first stick in a row of four to the end. |||| X | = ||||
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
mistysakura
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 121
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #5 on: Jul 9th, 2003, 8:34pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 9th, 2003, 12:36pm, WombatDeath wrote: 4-1+1=2? How does that work? The only way I can see it worlk is with brackets...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #6 on: Jul 9th, 2003, 9:17pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 9th, 2003, 5:07pm, SWF wrote:Moving only 2, but you can always add a trivial move, like moving the first stick in a row of four to the end. |||| X | = |||| |
| Hehe, of course the 1 match solution is trivial, but I tried to think of a 2-match solution and ask for 1-2-3 solutions, but couldn't. Nice! I had another 3-match solution in mind, though.
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 727
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #7 on: Jul 10th, 2003, 2:10am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 9th, 2003, 9:17pm, BNC wrote:I had another 3-match solution in mind, though. |
| Maybe this one: _ III / \I I = III sorry if it doesn't align quite right. plain math: 3 / sqrt(1) = 3
|
« Last Edit: Jul 10th, 2003, 2:16am by wowbagger » |
IP Logged |
"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
|
|
|
otter
Junior Member
Gender:
Posts: 142
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #8 on: Jul 10th, 2003, 6:25am » |
Quote Modify
|
How about X||| - | = X||? Should only be three moves if you count changing || to X as only one move.
|
|
IP Logged |
We shall not cease from exploration. And the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time. T.S. Eliot
|
|
|
WombatDeath
Junior Member
Posts: 89
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #9 on: Jul 10th, 2003, 12:32pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 9th, 2003, 8:34pm, mistysakura wrote: (Removed) How does that work? The only way I can see it worlk is with brackets... |
| Well, yes, but after staring at the damn thing for 20 minutes I'm surely entitled to discard such a silly notion as the left-to-right rule. No? Bah!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
WombatDeath
Junior Member
Posts: 89
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #10 on: Jul 10th, 2003, 12:48pm » |
Quote Modify
|
OK, here's one that doesn't involve cheating: ||| / ||| = || - |.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #11 on: Jul 11th, 2003, 1:23am » |
Quote Modify
|
A note: on second thought, the solution I had in mind, could also be generated moving 2 matches -- it depends on the original spacing between the matches.
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
WombatDeath
Junior Member
Posts: 89
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #12 on: Jul 11th, 2003, 12:01pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 11th, 2003, 1:23am, BNC wrote:A note: on second thought, the solution I had in mind, could also be generated moving 2 matches |
| Was it |+|-| = ||/||? That can be achieved in either two or three moves, depending on whether the sixth (or seventh, if you prefer) match is used as the dividing symbol or just stuck on the end of the equation. The first method (two moves) only works if you allow sufficient spacing.
|
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2003, 12:03pm by WombatDeath » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #13 on: Jul 11th, 2003, 12:13pm » |
Quote Modify
|
1. Many answers fit perfectly. In fact, many more than I thought! 2. A hint for the 'original' solution: some roman numerals look similar to decimal, while other don't.
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
TenaliRaman
Uberpuzzler
I am no special. I am only passionately curious.
Gender:
Posts: 1001
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #14 on: Jul 14th, 2003, 4:40am » |
Quote Modify
|
This may not be the original intended answer. ||| - | = || |--| 111-1=110
|
|
IP Logged |
Self discovery comes when a man measures himself against an obstacle - Antoine de Saint Exupery
|
|
|
BNC
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1732
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #15 on: Jul 16th, 2003, 2:52am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 14th, 2003, 4:40am, TenaliRaman wrote:This may not be the original intended answer. <hidden> |
| Actually, yes, it is.
|
|
IP Logged |
How about supercalifragilisticexpialidociouspuzzler [Towr, 2007]
|
|
|
TenaliRaman
Uberpuzzler
I am no special. I am only passionately curious.
Gender:
Posts: 1001
|
|
Re: Matches time again
« Reply #16 on: Jul 17th, 2003, 10:41am » |
Quote Modify
|
yeehaw!!
|
|
IP Logged |
Self discovery comes when a man measures himself against an obstacle - Antoine de Saint Exupery
|
|
|
|