Defendant:
Nakayama, Tandkichy, POW Camp, Oeyama, Japan
Docket No./ Date: 147/ May 15, 1947, Yokohama, Japan
Charge: Violation of the laws and customs of war: 1. Did willfully and
unlawfully mistreat PWs (spec 1-7, 9-10)
Specifications: beating using among others fist, shoe; kicking; forcing
PW to stand at attention for two hours; failing, neglecting and refusing
to give them necessary and available medicine and medical attention; burning;
forcing PWs to work when physically unfit;
Verdict: 4 years CHL
Reviewing Authority's Recommendations: Accused struck, beat and kickked
PWs for violations of camp regulations (having torn blankets) or for supposedly
lying or for no mentioned reason except illness/being excused from work
due to illness.
Reviewing Authority: Accused had orders from his commanding officer that
only a certain percentage of the prisoners could be excused from work;
but, he only sent slightly ill prisoners to work. Furthermore, he stated
that he was prompted because "they would try to feign illness, no
matter how well he treated them." He was trained in the army to hit
others and when he hit PWs, he did so without any intention of mistreating
them.
Prosecution Arguments: Record is legally sufficient to support all the
findings except that of 4. It is believed that "even under a plea
of guilty it should be corroborated in some manner." From the evidence
introduced and with their pleas of guilty, the guilt of the accused was
firmly established. There is no error which injuriously affected the rights
of the accused or any failure to accord him a fair trial. There is no
evidence that the accused was not sane at the time of the alleged acts
and at the time of trial.
Defense Arguments: Paul E. Spurlock, Reviewer
Judge Advocate's Recommendations: No Comment Made